The layout and arrangement alternatives for underground tunnels meant for permanent storage of vehicles and recommended for operation in ground conditions in the area of mid-size towns/cities are presented. In plan view, these layouts present system of parallel horizontal tunnels including an adit, drifts, vehicle storage rooms and maintenance rooms. The comparative analysis of the technical and economic indexes and their variation depending on the number of parking spots in the developed general plans shows that it is efficient to arrange rooms either on one side or on two sides of a tunnel. The proposed utilization index for the underground space is the best in the two-side arrangement of the rooms. The ecologo-economico-technological model of design solutions on the construction of parking houses from the viewpoint of the urban infrastructure development is implemented. The efficiency criterion of design solutions takes into account incomings from sale of car spots, minerals and raw materials, as well as expenditures connected with the parking house construction, equipment and operation. Selection of an efficient layout and arrangement of tunnel-type parking houses constructed by the underground method, using the land topography makes it possible to cut down the volume and cost of construction-and-assembly work and to shorten the building period.


Mid-size towns/cities, layout and arrangement, underground parking houses, tunnel type, unbuilt areas.

Issue number: 4
Year: 2018
UDK: 622.012; 624.19
DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2018-4-0-218-225
Authors: Alliluev V. N.

About authors: Alliluev V.N., Candidate of Technical Sciences, Assistant Professor, 309186, Gubkin, Russia, e-mail:,


1. Telichenko V. I., Zertsalov M. G., Konyukhov D. S., Korolevskiy K. Yu., Korol' E. A. Sovremennye tekhnologii kompleksnogo osvoeniya podzemnogo prostranstva megapolisov: Nauchnoe izdanie (Modern technologies for integrated development of underground spaces at mega-cities: Scientific publication), Moscow, Izd-vo ASV, 2010, 360 p.

2. Nichi J., Seike T. Planning and design of underground space use. Mem. Sch. Eng. Nagoya Univ. 1997, no 1.

3. Underground works and the environment. Tunnels and tunnel. Int. 1998, no 4.

4. Boller A. P. Unilisation fonctionnelle des volumes souterrains resultant des grands tra vaux.Tunnels et ouvrages souterrins. 1989. 93. Pp. 141—144.

5. Pilon B. In Paris, a City center goes underground. Underground Space. 1980. Vol. 5. Pp. 102—120.

6. Alliluev V. N., Bizyulev M. A. Materialy 11-go mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «Osvoenie mesto-

rozhdeniy mineral'nykh resursov i podzemnoe stroitel'stvo v slozhnykh gidrogeologicheskikh usloviyakh» (Mineral Development and Underground Construction in Complicated Hydrogeological Conditions: 11th International Symposium Processing), Belgorod, VIOGEM, 2013, pp. 374—377.

7. Alliluev V. N., Bizyulev M. A. Ekonomika, nauka, proizvodstvo. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov no 25 (Economics, science, production. Collection of proceedings no 25), Gubkin, 2012, pp. 6—9.

8. Alliluev V. N. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten'. 2016, no 3, pp. 181—187.

9. Rukovodstvo po kompleksnomu osvoeniyu podzemnogo prostranstva krupnykh gorodov (Guides on integrated development of underground space of large cities), Moscow, RAASN, 2004, 110 p.

10. Kulikova E. Yu. Metodologiya vybora ekologicheski bezopasnykh tekhnologiy podzemnogo stroitel'stva (Methodology of selecting environmentally benign technologies for underground construction), Moscow, Izd-vo MGGU, 2005, 342 p.

11. Rudyak M. S. Ratsional'noe ispol'zovanie gorodskogo podzemnogo prostranstva dlya grazhdanskikh ob"ektov (Sustainable utilization of urban underground space for civil engineering purposes), Moscow, Izd-vo MGGU, 2003, 235 p.

12. Kornilkov M. V., Polovov B. D., Kryazhevskikh A. N., Kuz'min N. G. Izvestiya vuzov. Gornyy zhurnal. 2014, no 6, pp. 70—78.

Subscribe for our dispatch