The detailed analysis of basic criteria included in the evaluation of performance of contractors on capital construction of infrastructure objects at Gazprom, both at the stage of selecting a contractor and during operation, is implemented. The proper choice of a contractor provides observance of dates, cost estimates and performance standards, as well as, in the course of cooperation, governs advisability of continuation of cooperation between a contractor and Gazprom’s companies. The scope of the analysis encompasses 4 groups of criteria for the evaluation of contractor performance: (1) technical audit at the head office of a contractor; (2) technical audit at the site of a construction object; (3) general requirements of environmental control; (4) industrial ecological monitoring. Based on the implemented analysis, it has been proved that it is necessary to refine the criteria in group 1 by means of the roundup financial rating of a contractor in order to level discordant results of the parametric analysis—evaluation of financial position by point rating system and by formation of an integral index. The steady-state financial position of a contactor will contribute to the introduction of information and analysis systems based in GIS-technologies for managerial decision-making aimed at prevention of environment degradation, at nature restoration, environmental improvement at a capital construction site and at safe operation of the completed project.


Contractor evaluation criteria, baseline study, rating, geoinformation system, ecological monitoring, environmental improvement, parametric analysis, quantitative criteria, rating mo- dels, nature restoration.

Issue number: 5
Year: 2018
UDK: 338.001.36
DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2018-5-0-214-219
Authors: Lozovskaya Ya. N., Novikov A. S.

About authors: Lozovskaya Ya.N., Doctor of Economical Sciences, Professor, e-mail:, Novikov A.S., Student, National University of Science and Technology «MISiS», 119049, Moscow, Russia.


1. Abryutina M. S. Finansovyy analiz: Uchebnoe posobie (Financial analysis: Educational aid), Moscow, DiS, 2011, 192 p.

2. Semenova Yu. A., Batukova L. R. Aktual'nye problemy aviatsii i kosmonavtiki. 2011, no 7, available at: (accessed 03.01.2017).

3. Grigor'eva I. Yu. Geoekologiya: Uchebnoe posobie (Geoecology: Educational aid), Moscow, NITs INFRA-M, 2013, 270 p.

4. Kondrat'eva E. A., Shal'neva M. S. Finansovyy vestnik: finansy, nalogi, strakhovanie, bukhgalterskiy uchet. 2013, no 8, available at: (accessed 22.12.2016).

5. Slobodnyak I. A. Finansovyy vestnik: finansy, nalogi, strakhovanie, bukhgalterskiy uchet. 2012, no 11, available at: (accessed 26.12.2016).

6. Shegurova V. P., Leushina E. V. Ekonomicheskaya nauka i praktika: materialy III mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (g. Chita, aprel' 2014 g.) (Economic science and practice: materials of III international scientific conference, Chita, April 2014), Chita, Molodoy uchenyy, 2014, pp. 80—84.

7. Neftegazovaya otrasl' Rossii v tsifrakh i faktakh, available at: (accessed 29.11.2016).

8. Yamburgskoe neftegazokondensatnoe mestorozhdenieav, ailable at: (accessed 25.11.2016).

9. Ivana Weissova, Boris Kollar, Anna Siekelova. Rating as a Useful Tool for Credit Risk Measurement. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015. Vol. 26. Pp. 278—285. DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00853-9.

10. Vitalina Delas, Euvgenia Nosova, Olena Yafinovych. Financial Security of Enterprises. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015. Vol. 27. Pp. 248—266. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00998-3.

11. Chih-Chuan Chen, Sheng-Tun Li. Credit rating with a monotonicity-constrained support vector machine model. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014. Vol. 41. Issue 16. Pp. 7235—7247.

12. Alejandro Germán Frank, Nathalie Dalle Molle, Wolfgang Gerstlberger, João Augusto Bonzanini Bernardi, Danilo Cuzzuol Pedrini. An integrative environmental performance index for benchmarking in oil and gas industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. Vol. 133. Pp. 1190—1203.

Subscribe for our dispatch