MITIGATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF MINING AND PROCESSING INDUSTRY IN THE RUSSIAN NORTH AND ARCTIC TERRITORIES

Arctic belongs to fragile natural ecosystems featuring high vulnerability relative to anthropogenic impact and low restorability rate. Environment in the Arctic and northern territories is in extreme conditions, and self-regeneration potential of natural systems is very limited. Mineral mining, especially open cutting greatly alters natural landscape structure by dumping and tailing storages. Yearly up to 1 Bt of waste is formed in the northern and Arctic areas of Russia. Huge quantities of gangue in dumps and tailings create serious ecological and economic problems in mining areas. A dump is a structure composed of different shape and size fragments subjected to rock mass pressure for a long time. This material can be used in construction of traffic arteries. Such approach can assist in ecological improvement in the northern territories through re-processing and reclamation of mineral waste.


For citation: Tarasov P. I., Khazin M. L., Golubev O. V. Mitigation of environmental impact of mining and processing industry in the Russian North and Arctic territories. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2019;(7):74-82. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2019-07-0-74-82.

Keywords

Ecology, gangue, dumps, Arctic, northern areas, highway engineering, railway.

Issue number: 7
Year: 2019
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 504.54
DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2019-07-0-74-82
Authors: Tarasov P. I., Khazin M. L., Golubev O. V.

About authors: P.I. Tarasov, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Deputy Director for Science, «Perspektiva-M» Ltd, 620219, Ekaterinburg, Russia, e-mail: tp6005@mail.ru, M.L. Khazin, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Ural State Mining University (USMU), 620144, Ekaterinburg, Russia, e-mail: Khasin@ursmu.ru, O.V. Golubev, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Assistant Professor, e-mail: golubev@usurt.ru, Ural State University of Railway Transport (USURT), 620219, Ekaterinburg, Russia. Corresponding author: M.L. Khazin, e-mail: tp6005@mail.ru.

REFERENCES:

1. Similä J., Jokinen M. Governing conflicts between mining and tourism in the Arctic. Arctic Review. 2018. Vol. 9. Pp. 148—173. DOI: org/10.23865/arctic.v9.1068.

2. Trump B. D., Kadenic M., Linkov I. A sustainable Arctic: Making hard decisions. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research. 2018. Vol. 50. No 1. e1438345. doi.org/10.1080/15230430.201 8.1438345.

3. Heikkinen H. I., Lépy É., Sarkki S., Komu T. Challenges in acquiring a social licence to mine in the globalising Arctic. Polar Record. 2016. Vol. 52. No. 4. Pp. 399—411. doi.org/10.1017/ S0032247413000843.

4. Sokolov Yu. I. Arctic: on the problem of accumulated environmental damage. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. 2013, no 2 (10), pp. 18—27. [In Russ].

5. Vorob'evskaya E. L., Kirillov S. N., Sedova N. B. Modern environmental management in the central part of the Kola Peninsula and the main geo-ecological problems. Ekologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2017. Vol. 21, no 6, pp. 30—35. [In Russ].

6. Krasovskaya T. M. Prirodopol'zovanie Severa Rossii [Use of the North of Russia], Moscow, Izd-vo LKI, 2008, 288 p.

7. Evseev A. V., Krasovskaya T. M. Novye podkhody k prirodopol'zovaniyu na Severe Rossi. Geografiya, obshchestvo, okruzhayushchaya sreda. T. 3: Prirodnye resursy, ikh ispol'zovanie i okhrana. Pod red. A. N. Gennadieva, D. A. 8. Krivolutskogo [New approaches to environmental management in the North of Russia. Geography, society, environment. Vol. 3. Gennadiev A. N., Krivolutskiy D. A. (Eds.)], Moscow, Gorodets, 2004.

9. Krasheninnikov O. N. Belogurova T. P., Lashchuk V. V., Pak A. A. Using Overburden of the Kola Peninsula to Obtain Rubble. Innovatsionnyy potentsial Kol'skoy nauki. Apatity, KNTS RAN, 2005, pp. 219—224.

10. Gershenkop A. Sh., Khokhulya M. S., Mukhina T. N. Processing of technogenic raw materials of the Kola Peninsula. Vestnik Kol'skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2010, no 1, pp. 4—8. [In Russ].

11. Burtseva E. I., Petrova A. N. Environmental problems of the northern territories of Yakutia in terms of industrial development and global warming. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2017, no 5, pp. 83—88. [In Russ].

12. Stepan'ko N. G., Stepan'ko A. A., Tkachenko G. G. Possible environmental consequences of the economic development of the northern territories of the Russian Far East. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. 2018, no 1 (29), pp. 26—36. [In Russ].

13. Boltyrov V. B., Seleznev S. G., Storozhenko L. A. Ecological consequences of long-term storage of man-made objects of the type “Dumps of the Allarechenskoye field” (Pechenga district, Murmansk region). Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta. 2015, no 4 (40), pp. 26—33. [In Russ].

14. Strategii razvitiya Arkticheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii i obespecheniya natsional'noy bezopasnosti na period do 2020 goda (utv. Prezidentom RF) [Strategies for the development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation and national security for the period up to 2020 (approved by the President of the Russian Federation)], SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.

15. Khazin M. L., Tarasov P. I., Golubev O. V. Empty rocks and waste produced by mining and processing plants — the basis for the construction of highways. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta. 2017, no 4 (48), pp. 90—94. DOI: 10.21440/2307-2091-2017-490-94. [In Russ].

16. Svod pravil po proektirovaniyu i stroitel'stvu: SP 32-104-98. Proektirovanie zemlyanogo polotna zheleznykh dorog kolei 1520 mm [Code of practice for design and construction: SP 32-104-98. Design of subgrade of 1520 mm gauge railways], Moscow, Gosstroy Rossii, 1999.

17. Stephenson S. R., Agnew J. A. The work of networks: Embedding firms, transport, and the state in the Russian Arctic oil and gas sector. Environment and Planning A. 2016. Vol. 48, no 3. pp. 558—576. doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15617755.

18. Litman T. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 2014. Vol. 28.

Subscribe for our dispatch