Methodical approach to the development of regulations of maintenance and repair of crushing equipment of mining companies

Crushing equipment is one of the key for mining enterprises, as it provides ore preparation for subsequent mineral processing. Recently, the issue of increasing the productivity of the crushing site at existing enterprises without radical reconstruction is relevant. The solution is the installation of high performance crushers and the optimization of the maintenance and repair system in order to ensure maximum availability and utilization in time. The article presents the experience of developing a methodology for constructing a strategy for maintenance and repairs (MRO) for crushing equipment. The experience of developing technological routine MRO for crushers manufactured by PJSC Uralmashzavod was taken into account.The problem of the collection, processing of source data and their analysis is considered to obtain reliable statistics on the time between failures of parts and components of crushers.Reflected are the features of the analysis of data on the operating time of assemblies and parts for failure during the service life for various operating conditions.Differentiation of the operating conditions of crushing equipment at mining enterprises is considered, which made it possible to formulate standardized repair cycles for several groups of operating conditions.A technique has been developed to form the structure of repair cycles of crushing equipment.Options for choosing a strategy for building a repair cycle are proposed. The quantity, periodicity and composition of MRO are determined.

Keywords: regulations, repair planning, maintenance and repair of the equipment, repair cycle structure, service life.
For citation:

Zhuravlev A.G., Chendyrev M.A., Cherepanov V.A., Glebov I.A. Methodical approach to the development of regulations of maintenance and repair of crushing equipment of mining companies. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020;(3-1):543-556. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/02361493-2020-31-0-543-556.

Acknowledgements:
Issue number: 3
Year: 2020
Page number: 543-556
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 622.73:621.926
DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-31-0-543-556
Article receipt date: 21.11.2019
Date of review receipt: 12.03.2020
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 20.03.2020
About authors:

Zhuravlev A.G.1, chief of laboratory, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), juravlev@igduran.ru,
Chendyrev M.A.1, junior researcher, Chendyrev@igduran.ru,
Cherepanov V.A.1, researcher, transport@igduran.ru,
Glebov I.A.1, junior researcher, i.glebov@igduran.ru,
1 Institute of mining, Ural branch, Russian academy of sciences, 620075, Ekaterinburg, MaminaSibiryakast., 58.

 

For contacts:
Bibliography:

1. Danilkin A.A., Martynov V. Yu., Andreeva L.I., Krasnikova T.I. The Ways to Organize an Effective System of Mining Equipment Maintenance. Gornoeoborudovanie i elektromekhanika, 2015, no 5 (114), pp. 39—43.[In Russ]

2. Andreeva L.I.Assessment of efficiency improvement potentiality in ore pretreatment at Kovdor Mining and Processing Plant. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2019, no 1, pp. 185–195.[In Russ]

3. Andreeva L.I., Davletshina D.R. Analysis of the System Scheduled Preventive Maintenance: A Prevention Strategy. Gornoe oborudovanie i elektromekhanika, 2014, no 6 (103), pp. 38—42.[In Russ]

4. Antonenko I.N., Kryukov I.E.The evolution of MRO practices and information management systems.Automationinindustry, 2011, no 10, pp 27–30. [In Russ]

5. Baskakova N.T., Pimonova T.K., Simakov D.B., Balandina T.A.Development of principles of a mro planning strategy in the enterprise management system. Stal’, 2014, no 4, pp 108—114.[In Russ]

6. Sinha R.S., Mukhopadhyay A.K. Failure rate analysis of Jaw Crusher: a case study. Sādhanā, 2019, Vol. 44, Article number: 17

7. Sinha R.S., Mukhopadhyay A.K. Failure analysis of jaw crusher and its components using ANOVA. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2016, Vol. 38, pp. 665–678.

8. Sinha R.S., Mukhopadhyay A.K. Reliability centered maintenance of cone crusher: a case study. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2015, Vol. 6, pp. 32–35.

9. Gharahasanlou A. N, Ataei M., Khalokakaie R., Barabadi A. Einian V. Risk based maintenance strategy: a quantitative approach based on time-to-failure model. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2017, Vol. 8, pp. 602–611.

10. Kondratov L.A., Smal’ko V.N. Improving the reliability of equipment due to further improvement of the maintenance and repair system and the introduction of new modern materials and technologies. Metallurg, 2016, no 5, pp. 88—91. [InRuss]

11. Nesterenko A.A. Introduction of modern resource models of determination of cost of repair and maintenance of processing equipment at the enterprises of the mining industry. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2014, no 11—3(52), pp. 697—699.[InRuss]

12. Ivanov V.A.1, Feshchenko A.A. Peculiar properties of the equipment maintenance and repair approaches in continuous production. Vestnik permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Mashinostroenie, materialovedenie. 2018, Vol 20, no 3, pp. 82—89. [InRuss]

13. Machulov V.N. Modern equipment maintenance and repair systems in the global mining industry. Gornaya promyshlennost’, 2013, no 4(110), pp. 77—80.[InRuss]

14. Boeva L.M., Osnovina O.N., Osnovin C.V. Optimization of scheduled preventive maintenance schedules within the framework of the “repair planning” information system of Lebedinsky Mining and Processing Plant JSC. Inzhenernyi vestnik Dona, 2016, no 2(41), pp. 33—40. [InRuss]

Subscribe for our dispatch