Assessment of influence of short-period geodynamic movements on stress–strain behavior of rock mass

Geodynamic diagnostics of rock mass is critical in terms of safe arrangement and operation of subsoil use objects. The modern geodynamic movements are one of the factors that govern the stress–strain behavior of rocks. The experimental research accomplished in the recent decades show that geodynamic movements are the wide-spread phenomena of complex time-and-space distribution. It is conditionally assumed to distinguish between the trend movements of the same direction and velocity over the period of observations and the cyclic short-period movements with cycle duration from a few minutes to a few hours. The cyclic short-period geodynamic movements can exert direct or indirect impact on subsoil use objects. The cyclic nature is governed by many natural factors. The influence of one or another factor on the stress–strain behavior of rock mass is yet unstudied unambiguously to date. However, it is evident that strains governed by the cyclicity of movements should be taken into account in geodynamic diagnostics. The implemented studies of short-period movements on testing grounds by continuous monitoring using GNSS methods for many hours at spacing from two hundred meters to two kilometers revealed that directions of displacement of check points frequently exceeded accuracy of their determination. During the experiments, a procedure was developed to determine parameters of strain tensor in rock mass based on the prevailing direction and amplitude of short-period movements. The amplitude of short-period movement is a difference between the minimal and maximal values of displacements in a set of discrete measurements within continuous observation session. The obtained field of strains was compared with the values calculated by the data on the trend geodynamic movements for 6 years with the same check points in the same pattern. The correlation is found between the orientations of principal axes of strain tensors calculated by the data on the trend and shortperiod movements. The developed procedure makes it possible to take into account the shortperiod cyclicity of the modern geodynamic movements, and the found correlation between the orientation of strain tensor of the trend and cyclic movement enable express estimation of changes in the stress–strain behavior of rocks.

Keywords: Modern geodynamic movements, rock mass, stress–strain behavior, cyclicity, movement vectors, strain tensors, geodynamic monitoring, satellite measurements.
For citation:

Konovalova Yu.P., Ruchkin V.I. Assessment of influence of short-period geodynamic movements on stress–strain behavior of rock mass. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020;(3-1):90-104. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-31-0-90-104.


The work is done in the framework of the state assignment 075-00581-1900. Subject # 0405-2019-007.

Issue number: 3
Year: 2020
Page number: 90-104
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 622.831
DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-31-0-90-104
Article receipt date: 21.11.2019
Date of review receipt: 26.01.2020
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 20.03.2020
About authors:

Konovalova Yu.P.1, Senior Researcher of Rock Movement Laboratory,,
Ruchkin V.I.1, Researcher of Rock Movement Laboratory,
1 The Institute of Mining of the Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620075, Ekaterinburg, Russia.


For contacts:

1. Sashurin A.D. Formation of the stress-strain state of a hierarchically blocky rock mass. Problemy nedropol’zovaniya [Elektronnyj resurs]: recenziruemoe setevoe periodicheskoe nauchnoe izdanie / IGD UrO RAN. 2015. no 1(4). pp. 38 44. Rezhim dostupa: //trud.igduran. ru. [In Russ]

2. Kuz’min Yu.O. Modern geodynamics of fault zones: faulting in real time. Geodynamics&Tectonophysics. 2014. T. 5. no 2. pp. 401—443. [In Russ]

3. Kuzmin Yu.O. Recent geodynamics of dangerous faults. Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth. 2016. T.52. no 5. pp. 709—722.

4. Selyukov E.I., Stigneeva L.T. Kratkie ocherki prakticheskoj mikrogeodinamiki [Brief essays on practical microgeodynamics]. «Piter». 2010. 175 p. [In Russ]

5. Buj Jen Tin’ Razrabotka i issledovanie metoda povysheniya tochnosti geodezicheskoj koordinatnoj osnovy Socialisticheskoj Respubliki V’etnam [Development and research of a method for improving the accuracy of the geodesic coordinate basis of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam]. Dis. kand. tekhn. nauk: 25.00.32. Moscow: RGB, 2006. [In Russ]

6. Ustinov A.V., Kaftan V.I. Daily and semi-daily fluctuations in the results of local monitoring using global navigation satellite systems. Izvestiya Vserossijskogo nauchnoissledovatel’skogo instituta gidrotekhniki im. B.E. Vedeneeva. 2016. T. 282. pp. 3—13 [In Russ]

7. Hefty J., Igondova M. Diurnal and semi-diurnal coordinate variations observed in EUREF permanent GPS network a case study for period from 2004.0 to 2006.9. Contribution to Geophysics and Geodesy. Vol. 40/3. 2010, Pages 225—247.

8. Panzhin A.A. Investigation of short-period deformations of fault zones of the upper part of the earth’s crust using satellite geodesy systems. Markshejderiya i nedropol’zovanie. 2003. no 2. pp. 43—54. [In Russ]

9. Nikolaidis R. Observation of geodetic and seismic deformation with the Global Positioning System. The Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Earth Sciences. University of California, San Diego. 2002. 265 p.

10. Tatarinov V.N., Bugaev E.G., Tatarinova T.A. Estimation of the earth’s crust deformations based on satellite observations when justifying the safety of underground isolation of radioactive waste. Gornyj zhurnal. 2015. no 10. pp. 27—32. [In Russ]

11. Konovalova Yu.P. Features of accounting for geodynamic factors when choosing safe sites for placement of responsible subsurface use objects. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Gornyj zhurnal. 2018. no 6. pp. 6—17. [In Russ]

12. Sashurin A.D. Sovremennaya geodinamika i tekhnogennye katastrofy [Modern geodynamics and technogenic catastrophes]. Geomekhanika v gornom dele: doklady nauchno-tekhnicheskoj konferencii 19—21 noyabrya 2002 g. Ekaterinburg: IGD UrO RAN, 2003. pp. 180—191. [In Russ]

13. Bos M., Bastos L., Fernandes R. The influence of seasonal signals on the estimation of the tectonic motion in short continuous GPS time-series. Journal of Geodynamics, Volume 49, Issue 3—4, April 2010, R. 205—209.

14. Biessy G., Moreau F., Dauteuil O., Bour O. Surface deformation of an intraplate area from GPS time series. Journal of Geodynamics, Volume 52, Issue 1, July 2011, pp. 24—33.

15. He X., Hua X., Yu K., Xuan W., Lu T., Zhang W., Chen X. Accuracy enhancement of GPS time series using principal component analysis and block spatial filtering. Advances in Space Research. 2015. Vol. 55, Issue 5. March. pp. 1316—1327.

16. He X., Montillet J.-P., Fernandes R., Bos M., Yu, K., Hua, X., Jiang W. Review of current GPS methodologies for producing accurate time series and their error sources. Journal of Geodynamics, Volume 106, 1 May 2017, pp. 12—29.

17. Gülal E., Erdoǧan H., Tiryakioǧlu I. Research on the stability analysis of GNSS reference stations network by time series analysis. Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal, Volume 23, Issue 6, December 2013, pp. 1945–1957.

18. Yan Bao, Wen Guo, Guoquan Wang et al. Millimeter-Accuracy Structural Deformation Monitoring Using Stand-Alone GPS. Journal of Surveying Engineering. 2017. Vol. 144.

19. Yigit C.O., Coskun M.Z. Yavasoglu H. et al. The potential of GPS precise point positioning method for point displacement monitoring: A case study. Measurement. 2016. Vol. 91. pp. 398—404.

20. Bezuhov N.I. Osnovy teorii uprugosti, plastichnosti i polzuchesti [Fundamentals of the theory of elasticity, plasticity and creep]. Moscow: «Vysshaya shkola». 1961. 537 p. [In Russ]

Subscribe for our dispatch