Accounting of modern geodynamic movements in normative documentation

In article the actual problem of updating of the current legislation on designing for conformity to modern representations about an array of rocks is designated. Modern geodynamic movements play an important role in the formation of hazardous and emergency situations in surface and underground industrial and social facilities. Currently, in the regulatory documentation for the design of modern geodynamic movements are attributed to separate so-called areas of development of natural and technological processes, so the processes arising under the influence of modern geodynamic movements, are studied only for objects of high responsibility and only on additional request of the task, which is prepared by the customer. Prevention of dangerous development of building object destruction is possible at a stage of designing of constructions at performance of engineering researches. In most cases, engineering-geological and engineering-geodetic surveys are conducted without taking into account the factor of modern geodynamics, which is especially unacceptable in the design of social and industrial facilities, to which increased safety requirements are imposed. At present, the requirements of the standards do not fully correspond to the modern concept of rock mass, mobility of the upper crust of the Earth, which significantly complicates their application in practice. By results of researches it is revealed a number of the reasons of a deviation from requirements of standards for increase of safety of new building or operation of already existing responsible objects taking into account deformation processes under the influence of modern geodynamic movements.

Keywords: modern geodynamic movements, normative documentation, engineering surveys, massif, natural and man-made disasters, design.
For citation:

Kaiumova A.N., Balek A.E., Ozornin I.L. Accounting of modern geodynamic movements in normative documentation. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020;(3-1):78-89. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-31-0-78-89.

Acknowledgements:

The work is done in the framework of the state assignment No. 075-0058119-00 Theme 0405-2019-0007.

Issue number: 3
Year: 2020
Page number: 78-89
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 622.861:622.83
DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-31-0-78-89
Article receipt date: 21.11.2019
Date of review receipt: 20.01.2020
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 20.03.2020
About authors:

Kaiumova A.N.1,2, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Researcher of Laboratory of geomechanics of underground structures, е-mail: alfkaa@mail.ru,
Balek A.E.1, Leading researcher, Doctor of engineering sciences, Institute of mining of Ural branch of RAS,
Ozornin I.L.1, Head of Laboratory of Geomechanics of Underground Structures,
1 The Institute of Mining of the Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620075, Ekaterinburg, Russia;
2 Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, Kuybysheva str., 30.

 

For contacts:
Bibliography:

1. Zyryanov I.V., Akishev A.N., Bokiy I.B., Bondarenko I.F. Innovations in diamond mine planning in a permafrost zone. Mining Industry Journal. 2018. no5 (141). 66 p. DOI: 10.30686/1609—9192—2018—5-141—66—69. [In Russ].

2. Yershova А. N, Dolgov S.I., Trifonov O.V. Issues of trunk pipelines safety regulation on enlargement of urban settlement. Vestnik gazovoj nauki: nauchno-tekhnicheskij sbornik . 2018. no2(34). pp. 234—244. [In Russ].

3. Kaiumova A.N. About the problem of actualization of the normative documentation for the surveys in the areas of development dangerous natural and techno-natural processes. Sbornik dokladov VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii «Innovatsionnyye geotekhnologii pri razrabotke rudnykh i nerudnykh mestorozhdeniy», Ekaterinburg 2018. P.320—325. [In Russ].

4. Geodinamicheskaya bezopasnost’ osvoeniya uglevodorodnogo potenciala nedr Rossii: Koncepciya [Geodynamic Safety of Hydrocarbon Potential Development in Russia]. M-vo energetiki Rossijskoj Federacii, Ros. akad. nauk. In-t geologii i razrab. goryuchih iskopaemyh, Nauch.-proizv. centr «Geodinamika i ekologiya»; [Sidorov V.A. [i dr.]. Moscow: Izd-vo IGiRGI, 2000. 56 p. [In Russ]

5. Bykova N.M.Transportnye sooruzheniya na aktivnyh geostrukturah. Tekhnologii sistemnogo podhoda [Transport structures on active geo-structures. Technologies of the system approach]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sib. otd-nie, 2008. 212 p. [In Russ]

6. Tereshin A.A., Alekseev G.V.; Neguritsa, D.L. Geodetic monitoring of the frame building deformations during the works on the soils strengthening in the foundation base (in Russian). Markshaydersky vestnik. no 6 (115). 2015. P.30—33. [In Russ]

7. Sashurin A.D. Why the bridge “lowered its wings”. Technadzor. 2009. no 8. pp. 20–22. [In Russ]

8. Mel’nikov, E.K.; Shaburov, A.N. Estimation of the geodynamic factor role in the pipeline systems accident rate. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2010. Т. 185. pp. 37—40. [In Russ]

9. Sashourin A.D. The accident development at Sayano-Shushenskaya hydroelectric power station in Russia. Rock Dynamics and applications state of the art. 2013. pp. 611–617.4. T. Szwedzicki. Rock mass behaviour prior to failure. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 2003. P.573–584.

10. Xu N.W., Tang C.A., Sha C., Liang Z.Z., Yang J.Y. et al. Microseismic monitoring system establishment and its engineering applications to left bank slope of Jinping I Hydropower Station. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, Vol. 29, рр. 915—925.

11. Sherman S.I. Deformation waves as a trigger mechanism of seismic activity in seismic zones of the continental lithosphere. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2013, Vol. 4 (2), рр. 83–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.5800/GT¬2013¬4¬2¬0093.

12. Kuzmin Y.O. Recent geodynamic soffault zones: faulting inrealtime scale.. Geodynamics &Tectonophysics, 2014, Vol. 5 (2), pp. 401–443. [In Russ] DOI: 10.5800/ GT-2014—5-2—0135.

13. Kuzmin, Yu.O. Modern geodynamics: from the Earth crust movements to the responsible objects monitoring (in Russian). Fizika Zemli. 2019. no 1. pp. 78–103. [In Russ]

14. Kuzmin Yu. O. The topical problems of identifying the results of the observations in recent geodynamics. Izvestiya. Physics of thesolidearth, 2014, Vol. 5, рр. 641–656.

15. Dzurisin D. Volcano deformation. Geodetic monitoring techniques. Springer. UK. 2007. 441 p.

16. Sashourin A.D. Geomechanics in mining: basic and applied research = Geomechanics in mining: basic and applied research / / Mining journal = EURASIANMINING. 2012. no 1. pp. 29—32 / 17 19.

17. Panzhin A.A. Space-time geodynamic monitoring of objects of subsoil use. Gornyj zhurnal. 2012. no 1. pp. 39—43. [In Russ]

18. Melnik V.V. Assessment of the influence of structural and tectonic structure of the rock mass on the basis of engineering structures. Markshejderiya i nedropol’zovanie. 2014. no 6. pp. 56—59. [In Russ]

19. Code of rules 11—104—97 Engineering geodesical survey for construction. [In Russ]

20. Charlez F.Р. Rock Mechanics. Volume 1, 2. Petroleum applications. Teditions Technip. 27 rue Ginoux

21. RB-019—18 Safety Guide for the use of nuclear energy. Assessment of the initial seismicity of the area and site of the location of the object of nuclear energy use in engineering surveys and research, approved. by order of Rostekhnadzor of 02.03.2018 N 90

22. GOST 27751—2014 Reliability for constructions and foundations. General principles

23. Urban Planning Code of the Russian Federation. [In Russ]

24. Federal law no 384-FZ Technical regulations on the safety of buildings and facilities. [In Russ]

25. About mineral resources: Law of the Russian Federation of 21.02.1992 N 2395—1. [In Russ]

26. Shabarov A.N., Zamorokina Yu. V., Popov A.L., Bagautdinov I.I. Complex approach to geodynamic zoning of mine fields. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2018. no S49. Pp. 496—506. [In Russ]

27. Kaiumova A.N. Some peculiarities in the examination of industrial safety of documentation for construction in the areas of hazardous natural and techno-natural processes development. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Gornyi zhurnal. 2018. no 6. P.102 107 DOI: 10.21440/0536—1028—2017—8-102—107. [In Russ]

Subscribe for our dispatch