Analysis of the mobile complex structure for organogenic materials mining by in-pit method

As a result of the studies performed, the advantages of the system of in-pit processing and transportation of processed peat are shown. These systems allow for primary processing, separation of production waste and reduce the volume of in-pit transportation and transportation costs. A number of intensive principles for the formation of the structure of a set of equipment for the extraction of organogenic materials by the in-pit method are considered. Completion of equipment should be based on the analysis of limiting conditions and the establishment of areas of permissible modes of machines operation. The main types of mobile mining and loading equipment, equipment for crushing and mechanical dewatering of peat, transport units and a module for compaction of peat are recommended. The relationship when choosing a set of equipment is based on an operational indicator — productivity. In the course of performing successive technological operations from the extraction of peat to its compaction and drying, the density is transformed from 860 to 430 kg / m3 with a decrease in moisture content from 9.0 to 1.86 kg / kg, and by-products are extracted. This, in turn, determines the size-mass and energy parameters of the technological equipment employed in each technological operation. The final product is a compact — a dried bulk semi-finished product from peat for the further production of a number of products for agro-industrial and environmental purposes. The results of the research performed can be used for the technical re-equipment of technological equipment fleet and the selection of a rational set of equipment at the stage of developing projects for the development of territories with soft soils.

Keywords: open pit, peat raw materials, grinding, separation, dewatering, transportation, mobile equipment, compact.
For citation:

Mikhailov А. V., Kazakov Yu. A., Garufullin D. R., Korotkova О. Yu., Agaguena A. Analysis of the mobile complex structure for organogenic materials mining by in-pit method. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2022;(6—1):317—330. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2022_61_0_317.

Acknowledgements:
Issue number: 6
Year: 2022
Page number: 317-330
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 553.97:622.331
DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2022_61_0_317
Article receipt date: 14.01.2022
Date of review receipt: 30.05.2022
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 10.05.2022
About authors:

Mikhailov А. V.1, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-7737, e-mail: Mikhayov_AV@pers.spmi.ru;
Kazakov Yu. A.1, graduate student of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, https:// orcid.org/0000-0002-7040-5412, e-mail: s185048@stud.spmi.ru;
Garufullin D. R.1, graduate student of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, https:// orcid.org/0000-0001-9477-1647, e-mail: s185043@stud.spmi.ru;
Korotkova О. Yu.1, graduate student of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, https:// orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-4707, e-mail: s195038@stud.spmi.ru;
Agaguena A.1, graduate student of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, https:// orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-3803, e-mail: s205087@stud.spmi.ru;
1 Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106, Saint Petersburg, Vasil’evskij ostrov, 21 linija d.2, Russia.

 

For contacts:

Mikhailov А. V., e-mail: Mikhayov_AV@pers.spmi.ru.

Bibliography:

1. Burt C., Caccetta L. Equipment Selection for Surface Mining: A Review. Journal Interfaces archive. 2014, vol. 44, iss. 2, pp. 143–162. DOI: 10.1287/inte.2013.0732.

2. Abbaspour H., Drebenstedt C., Paricheh M., Ritter R. Optimum location and relocation plan of semi-mobile in-pit crushing and conveying systems in open-pit mines by transportation problem. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full /10.1080/ 17480930.2018.1435968 (Accessed: 06 November 2021).

3. Paricheh M., Osanloo M., Rahmanpour M. In-pit crusher location as a dynamic location problem. The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2017, no. 117, pp. 599–607.

4. Johnson M. Impact of in-pit crushing and conveying on pit shell optimization. Deswik, 2015, pp. 1–16. URL: https://www.deswik.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Impact-of-IPCC-on-Pit-Shell-Optimization.pdf, (Accessed: 11.11.2021).

5. Dean M., Knights P., Kizil M. S., Nehring M. Selection and planning of fully mobile in-pit crusher and conveyor systems for deep open pit metalliferous applications. Proceedings of third international future mining conference. Sydney: AusIMM, 2015, pp. 219–225.

6. Mikhailov A. V., Garmaev O. Z., Garifullin D. R., Kazakov Y. A. A potential application of in-pit crushing-conveying and dewatering system in peat mining. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019, vol. 378, no. 1, 012086. DOI: 10.1088/1755—1315/378/1/012086.

7. Drebenstedt C. The responsible mining concept contributions on the interface between science and practical needs. Mine Planning and Equipment Selection, Springer Cham, 2014, pp. 3–24, DOI :10.1007/978—3-319—02678—7_1.

8. Yakonovskaya T. B., Zhigulskaya A. I. Heuristic approach to Yurevskoe peat deposit appraisal using vertical profiling data. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2021, no. 5, pp. 157–168. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_5_0_157.

9. Kuznecov S. M. Theory and practice of forming sets and systems of machines in construction, Moscow-Berlin: DirectМEDIA, 2015, 271 p. [In Russ].

10. Mikhailov A. V., Ivanov S. L., Gabov V. V. Creation and efficient operation of machine fleet in peat-processing companies. Bulletin of PNRPU. Geology. Oil & Gas Engineering & Mining. 2015, no. 14, рр. 82–91. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.15593/2224—9923/2015.14.9.

11. Balovnev V. I. Determination of parameters and selection of earthmoving machines, Moscow, Poligraf, 2010, 224 p. [In Russ].

12. Fomin S. I., Faul’ A. A., Ponomaryov A. I. Open cast technological system with in-pit fully mobile crushing reliability avaluation. Journal of Mining Institute. 2011, vol. 190, pp. 51–56. [In Russ].

13. Rzhevskij V. V. Open pit mining. Part 2. Technology and complex mechanization, Moscow, Librokom, 2010, 551 p. [In Russ].

14. Faul’ A. A. Determination of parameters and indicators of open-cast mining of deposits of non-metallic building materials using mobile crushing complexes, candidate’s thesis, Sankt-Peterburg, 2012. 193 p. [In Russ].

15. Lapshin N. S. Justification of organizational and technical methods of opencast development of sand and gravel deposits using mobile crushing and screening complexes, candidate’s thesis, Sankt-Peterburg, 2020, 129 p. [In Russ].

16. Nehring M., Knights P. F., Kizil M. S., Hay E. A comparison of strategic mine planning approaches for in-pit crushing and conveying, and truck/shovel systems. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2018, vol. 28, pp. 205–214, DOI: 10.1016/j. ijmst.2017.12.026.

17. Rahmanpour M., Osanloo M., Adibee N., Akbarpourshirazi, M. An approach to determine the location of an in-pit crusher in open pit mines. International Journal of Engineering (IJE) Transactions C. 2014, vol. 27, no. 9. pp. 14475–1484.

18. Yablonev A. L., Dorogov O. V. Justification of the parameters of pneumatic wheel running passive trailed machines for transportation of milled peat. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2015, no. 7, pp. 174–177. [In Russ].

19. Osobov V. I. Mechanical feed technology. Moscow, Kolos, 2009, 344 p. [In Russ].

20. Litvinenko V. S., Dvoynikov M. V., Trushko V. L. Elaboration of a conceptual solution for the development of the Arctic shelf from seasonally flooded coastal areas. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2021, vol. 32. pp. 113–119. DOI: 10.1016/j. ijmst.2021.09.010.

21. Ibrahim A., Kim H. B., Asadi A., Nahazanan H. Foundation and embankment construction in peat: an overview. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2014, vol. 19, pp. 10079–10094.

22. Munro R., Evans R., Saarenketo T. Roadex II Project: Focusing on Low-Volume Roads in the European Northern Periphery. Transportation Research Board. 2007, vol. 1989—2, no. 1, pp. 292–299. DOI: 10.3141/1989—76.

23. Voronova E. Y. Perspectives of development of unitizing heading systems. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2014, no. 3, pp. 56–64. [In Russ].

24. Zimmermann E., Kruse W. Mobile crushing and conveying in quarries a chance for better and cheaper production. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Continuous Surface Mining. Aachen, 2006, pp. 1–7.

25. Naumenko V. G., Samojlik V. G., Zvyaginceva N. A., Nazimko E. I. Dehydration of mineral processing products, Doneck, DONNTU, 2019, 183 p. [In Russ].

26. Moreno J. J., Kendall S., Ortiz A. Dewatering options for management of fine gold tailings in Western Australian Goldfelds. Proceedings of the 21st International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 2018, pp. 413–424.

27. Mikhailov A. V., Garmaev O. J., Fedorov A. S., Garifullin D. R. Efficiency of open cast peat mining with mechanical field dewatering. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2019, no. 7, pp. 30–41. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2019-07—0-30—41.

28. Kremcheev E. A. Special Features of a Structure of Technical Operations for Peat Excavation with Stage Dewatering. Journal of Mining Institute. 2018, vol. 231, pp. 225–234. DOI:10.25515/PMI.2018.3.225.

Our partners

Подписка на рассылку

Раз в месяц Вы будете получать информацию о новом номере журнала, новых книгах издательства, а также о конференциях, форумах и других профессиональных мероприятиях.