Intellectualization of Russia's extractive industry in the context of technological sovereignty

This article examines the processes of intellectualization in Russia’s extractive industry through the adoption of advanced production technologies (APT). The study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the dynamics and structure of APT, the effects and barriers associated with their implementation, and to identify elements of firms’ technological strategies that support the development of domestic digital solutions. The empirical basis of the research consists of official Rosstat data on mining enterprises for the period 2015–2025. The methodology includes periodization of indicator dynamics, comparison of mean values across identified stages, structural analysis of APT by source and type, and the calculation of integral indices to evaluate implementation effects and barriers. The findings indicate that intellectualization is predominantly intensive in nature: despite a moderate decline in the number of organizations adopting APT, the average number of technologies per organization and the share of domestic solutions have increased. The structure of APT is shifting toward production information systems, industrial computing technologies, big data, and organizational and managerial solutions. Effects related to productivity growth, flexibility, standards compliance, and reduced import dependence are strengthening, while the export component is weakening. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the integrated analysis of quantitative data on APT usage alongside qualitative assessments of their effects, barriers, and technological strategies. The results suggest that the transition to domestic digital solutions is accompanied by the development of training programs, cooperation with engineering organizations, and the implementation of knowledge management systems. These findings provide a basis for refining industrial and innovation policy priorities aimed at strengthening technological sovereignty in the extractive sector.

Keywords: technology adoption, artificial intelligence, technological solution, technological strategy, intellectualization, advanced production technologies, technological strategy, fuel and energy complex
For citation:

Narbut V. V., Abdikeev N. M. Intellectualization of Russia's extractive industry in the context of technological sovereignty. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2026;(11-1):167-181. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2026_111_0_167.

Acknowledgements:

The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budgetary funds on the state assignment of the Financial University.

Issue number: 11-1
Year: 2026
Page number: 167-181
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 622:004
DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2026_111_0_167
Article receipt date: 04.09.2026
Date of review receipt: 07.10.2026
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 20.10.2026
About authors:

V.V. Narbut1, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assistant Professor, Leading Researcher, e-mail: vvnarbut@fa.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1551-5114,
N.M. Abdikeev1, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Chief Researcher, e-mail: nabdikeev@fa.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5999-0542,
1 Institute of Financial and Industrial Policy and Economic Security, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

 

For contacts:

V.V. Narbut, e-mail: vvnarbut@fa.ru.

Bibliography:

1. Drachev N. A., Podshivalova M. V., Podshivalov D. V. Assessment of digital transformation in the Russian mining industry: a resource-based approach. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2025, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 78—87. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.14529/em250106. 

2. Gareev T. R. Technological sovereignty: from conceptual contradictions to practical implementation. Terra Economicus. 2023, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 38—54. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-38-54. 

3.Budrina E. V., Timoshilova P. S. Technological sovereignty as a strategic priority: institutional methods and innovation trajectories. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. 2025, no. 3, pp. 15—20. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.24412/1998-5533-2025-3-15-20. 

4. Cherepovitsyn A. E., Tretyakov N. A. Development of a new assessment system for the applicability of digital projects in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023, vol. 262, pp. 628—642. [In Russ].

5. Linnik V. Yu., Laznik A. A., Gordeeva T. S. Strengthening technological sovereignty of the Russian oil and gas industry under turbulent geopolitical conditions. Vestnik universiteta. 2024, no. 11, pp. 34—42. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2024-11-34-42. 

6. Lyushina E. Yu. Analysis of the state and use of advanced production technologies in Russia. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Ekonomicheskie nauki. 2022, no. 2, pp. 5—9. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17513/sres.1096. 

7. Bogachev Yu. S., Trifonov P. V., Abdikeev N. M. Main directions and mechanisms of industrial digitalization in the Russian Federation. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management. 2022, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 151—159. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2022-2-151-159. 

8. Yakushev N. O., Ustinova K. A., Kochnev A. A. Import substitution as a factor in the development of domestic digital technology. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2024, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 82—101. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.5. 

9. Onifade M., Adebisi J. A., Shivute A. P., Genc B. Challenges and applications of digital technology in the mineral industry. Resources Policy. 2023, vol. 85, article 103978. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103978. 

10. Lukichev S. V., Nagovitsyn O. V. Scientific and methodological approaches in implementing the MGIS import substitution project at PJSC ALROSA. Journal of Mining Institute. 2025, vol. 275, pp. 155—166. [In Russ].

11. Zhigalov V. I. Digital economy and import substitution: stages and prospects of development in Russia. Diskussiya. 2023, no. 2 (117), pp. 95—106. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.46320/2077-7639-2023-2-117-95-106. 

12. МMatveeva L. G., Kaplyuk E. V., Nizov N. V. Ways to reduce the technological dependence of Russian industry on imports under the imperatives of import substitution. Vestnik Akademii znaniy. 2021, no. 4 (45), pp. 184—191. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.24412/2304-6139-2021-11355. 

13. Yurak V. V., Polyanskaya I. G., Malyshev A. N. The assessment of the level of digitalization and digital transformation of the oil and gas industry of the Russian Federation. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2023, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 87—110. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17073/2500-0632-2022-08-16. 

14. Gubernatorov A. M., Kuznetsov D. V., Shuvalova O. V., Lomov E. E., Stelmashenko N. D. Technological sovereignty of the Russian mining industry: financial and economic assessment of import substitution of heavy mining equipment and mineral processing machinery (2022–2025). Russian Mining Industry Journal. 2026, no. 4, pp. 84—92. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2026-4-84-92. 

15. Liang G., Liang Y., Niu D., Shaheen M. Balancing sustainability and innovation: The role of artificial intelligence in shaping mining practices for sustainable mining development. Resources Policy. 2024, vol. 90, article 104793. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104793. 

16. Calzada Olvera B. Innovation in mining: what are the challenges and opportunities along the value chain for Latin American suppliers? Mineral Economics. 2022, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 35—51. DOI: 10.1007/s13563-021-00251-w. 

17. Matrenin P. V., Stepanova A. I. Enhancing the interpretability of electricity consumption forecasting models for mining enterprises using SHapley Additive exPlanations. Journal of Mining Institute. 2025, vol. 271, pp. 154—167. [In Russ].

18. Morgoeva A. D., Morgoev I. D., Klyuev R. V., Khetagurov V. N., Gavrina O. A. Short-term prediction of energy consumption at concentration factory. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2023, no. 5-1, pp. 157—169. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2023_51_0_157.

19. Petrov I. V., Shcherbachenko P. S., Tikhomirov A. A. Monitoring the business reputation index of business entities in the mining industry. Russian Mining Industry Journal. 2025, no. 4, pp. 116—121. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2025-4-116-121. 

20. Lund E., Pekkari A., Johansson J., Lööw J. Mining 4.0 and its effects on work environment, competence, organisation and society — A scoping review. Mineral Economics. 2024, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 827—840. DOI: 10.1007/s13563-024-00427-0. 

21. Crabbe M., Leader J., Hall H. M., Burdett M. Technology adoption in the Canadian mining sector: A systematic scoping review. Resources Policy. 2025, vol. 103, article 105566. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105566. 

22. Petrov I. V., Merkulina I. A., Omarova G. Impact of the integration of education, science and business on the development of entrepreneurship in coal mining companies. Ugol’. 2024, no. 7 (1182), pp. 42—47. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2024-7-42-47. 

Подписка на рассылку

Подпишитесь на рассылку, чтобы получать важную информацию для авторов и рецензентов.