Gas tomography-based study of geodynamics in location area of underground gas storage: A case-study of the Volgograd UGS

Various intensity geodynamic activity and tectonic stresses affect reliable underground gas storage and local ecology. One of the approaches to estimation of geodynamics in location areas of underground gas storages is combination of geodynamic zoning and microgeodynamic mapping using gas survey data. The article illustrates this approach as a casestudy of the Volgograd UGS. Geodynamic zoning revealed the regional geodynamically active zones in the location area of the test object. Using gas survey results (29 lines), depth profiles of geodynamic activity are plotted with the geodynamic zones of compression and tension. The stresses are estimated using the analysis of dynamic interaction of crustal blocks with the subsequent computer-aided modeling. The information presentation as a series of depth profiles of geodynamics is the core of the hybrid method of gas tomography, which allows a detailed analysis of geodynamic activity of rock mass. The study of positional relationship between zones of geodynamic activity and locations of underground gas storages in rock salt formations proves the importance of such research for understanding geodynamics of rock masses and its impact on operating conditions of underground gas storages.

Keywords: underground gas storage, ecological situation, gas survey, stress state, geodynamic activity zone, geodynamic zoning, gas tomography, operating conditions.
For citation:

Oborin A. V., Batugin A. S., Divakov V. I., Khotchenkov E. V., Stepanova A. D. Gas tomography-based study of geodynamics in location area of underground gas storage: A case-study of the Volgograd UGS . MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2025;(7):73-89. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2025_7_0_73.

Acknowledgements:
Issue number: 7
Year: 2025
Page number: 73-89
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 502/504; 622.831.33; 551.248.2
DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2025_7_0_73
Article receipt date: 04.03.2025
Date of review receipt: 14.04.2025
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 10.06.2025
About authors:

A.V. Oborin, Deputy Head of Department, PJSC Gazprom, Saint-Petersburg, Russia,
A.S. Batugin, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, NUST MISIS, 119049, Moscow, Russia,
V.I. Divakov, Cand. Sci. (Geol. Mineral.), Assistant Professor, LLC Center for Comprehensive Research of Subsoil «Katari», Moscow, Russia, e-mail: vdivakov@mail.ru,
E.V. Khotchenkov, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Head of Department, V.I. Vernadsky State Geological Museum, Russian Academy of Sciences, 125009, Moscow, Russia,
A.D. Stepanova, Master's Degree Student, NUST MISIS, 119049, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: stepasasa3@gmail.com.

 

For contacts:

E.V. Khotchenkov, e-mail: jek79@mail.ru.

Bibliography:

1. Kazankova E. R., Kornilova N. V. Geoecological problems of underground gas storage in Russia. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza (Russian Oil and Gas Geology). 2016, no. 3, pp. 102—106. [In Russ].

2. Nikonov A. I. Rol' geodinamicheskikh protsessov v funktsionirovanii podzemnykh khranilishch gaza (na primere Shchelkovskogo i Kasimovskogo podzemnykh khranilishch) [The role of geodynamic processes in the functioning of underground gas storage facilities (using the Shchyolkovskoye and Kasi- movskoye underground storage facilities as an example)], Candidate’s thesis, Moscow, 2003, 26 p.

3. Zhukov V. S. Impact of modern geodynamic processes on filtration-capacitive properties of UGS reservoirs. Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya «Sovremennaya geodinamika nedr i ekologo-promyshlen- naya bezopasnost' ob"ektov neftegazovogo kompleksa» [International conference «Modern geodynam- ics of the subsoil and ecological-industrial safety of oil and gas facilities»], Moscow, 2009. [In Russ]. https://oilgasjournal.ru/vol_3/zhukov.html.

4. Foulger G. R., Wilson M. P., Gluyas J. G., Julian B. R., Davies R. J. Global review of human- induced earthquakes. Earth-Science Reviews. 2017, vol. 178, pp. 438—514. DOI: 10.1016/j.earsci- rev.2017.07.008.

5. Benetatos C., Málek J., Verga F. Moment tensor inversion for two micro-earthquakes occurring inside the Háje gas storage facilities, Czech Republic. Journal of Seismology. 2013, vol. 17, pp. 557—576.

6. Shkuratnik V. L., Kravchenko O. S., Filimonov Yu. L. Experimental study of the dependences of acoustic-emission and rheological characteristics of rock salt on stress and temperature. Fiziko-tekh- nicheskie problemy razrabotki poleznykh iskopaemykh. 2019, no. 4, pp. 20—26. [In Russ].

7. Wu C., Liu J., Zhou Z. Study on creep properties of salt rock with impurities during triaxial creep test. Gongcheng Kexue Yu Jishu, Advanced Engineering Science. 2017, vol. 49, pp. 165—172. DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese.201600854.

8. Guang-chuan L., Huang X., Peng X. Investigation on the cavity evolution of underground salt cavern gas storages. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2016, vol. 33, pp. 118—134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.018.

9. Tongtao W., Chunhe Y., Jiasong Ch., Daemen J. J. K. Geomechanical investigation of roof fail- ure of China’s first gas storage salt cavern. Engineering Geology. 2018, vol. 243, pp. 59—69. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.06.013.

10. Arutyunov A. E., Grunin A. G., Zubarev A. P., Kuzmyin Yu. O., Nikonov A. I., Osipov A. A., Polukhina S. S. Mining and geological substantiation and design of geodynamic polygons at under- ground gas storage facilities using the example of the Kasimovskoye UGS. Mine Surveying Bulletin. 2012, no. 4, pp. 43—51.

11. Elio J., Ortega M. F., Mazadiego L. F. Monitoring of soil gases in the characterization stage of CO2 storage in saline aquifers and possible effects of CO2 leakages in the groundwater system. Geologic Carbon Sequestration, 2016, pp. 81—95. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27019-7_5.

12. Fibbi G., Del Soldato M., Fanti R. Review of the Monitoring Applications Involved in the Un- derground Storage of Natural Gas and CO2. Energies. 2023, vol. 16, no. 1, article 12. DOI: 10.3390/ en16010012.

13. Kulikova E. Yu., Balovtsev S. V., Skopintseva O. V. Geoecological monitoring during mining operations. Sustainable Development of Mounting Territories. 2024, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 580—588. DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2024-16-2-580-588.

14. Manevich P. P., Antoshin V. V., Kolikov K. S. Vegetation and soil indices for satellite monitoring of lands in areas of surface coal mining. Russian Mining Industry Journal. 2025, no. 1, pp. 118—122. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2025-1-118-122.

15. Kutepov Yu. I., Kutepova N. A., Ponomarenko M. R., Kutepov Yu. Yu. Geomechanical monitor- ing of slope stability in pitwall and dumps in coal mining. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2023, no. 5, pp. 69—74. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2023.05.10.

16. Kozyrev A. A., Onuprienko V. S., Zhukova S. A., Zhuravleva O. G. Development of instru- mental and methodological support for monitoring induced seismicity at the Khibiny apatite-nepheline deposits. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020, no. 9, pp. 19—26. [In Russ].

17. Morozov V. N., Tatarinov V. N., Manevich A. I. Modeling the stress-deformations in the epicen- tral zone of a strong earthquake in Turkey (Izmit, 1999, M 7.4). Vulkanologiya i seysmologiya. 2020, no. 2, pp. 43—54. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.31857/so203030620020042.

18. Leontiev A. V., Skulkin A. A. Usage of the hydraulic fracturing method in monitoring in the act- ing stresses in a salt massif. Herald of KRSU. 2017, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 188—190. [In Russ].

19. Malovichko A. A., Dyagilev R. A., Shulakov D. Yu., Baranov Yu. V. Monitoring of natural- technogenic seismicity in the Verkhnekamsk region. Problemy geodinamiki, seysmichnosti i minerage- nii podvizhnykh poyasov i platformennykh oblastey litosfery: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii [Problems of geodynamics, seismicity, and minerageny of mobile belts and platform regions of the lithosphere: Proceedings of the International Conference], Ekaterinburg, 1998, pp. 118—120. [In Russ].

20. Petukhov I. M., Batugina I. M. Geodinamika nedr [Subsoil geodynamics], Moscow, 1999, 288 p.

21. Rasskazov I. Yu., Fedotova Iu. V., Anikin P. A., Migunov D. S., Konstantinov A. V. Improvement of methods and means of geomechanical monitoring based on digital technologies. Russian Mining Industry Journal. 2023, no. 5S, pp. 18—24. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.30686/1609-9192-2023-5S-18-24.

22. Kobylkin S. S., Pugach A. S. Rock burst forecasting technique and selecting a safe coal face advance direction. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2022, no. 7(2), pp. 126—136. [In Russ].

23. Shevchuk S. V., Kvyatkovskaya S. S., Shevchuk R. V., Shermatova S. S., Golovko I. V. About of geodynamic monitoring of the Kaliningrad region. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2021, no. 2-1, pp. 298—309. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2021-21-0-298-309.

24. Batugin A. S., Khan S. A., Divakov V. I., Oborin A. V., Khotchenkov E. V., Shevchuk S. V. Study of the geodynamics in the area of the Kaliningrad UGS by the method of gas tomography. Gas Industry Journal. 2024, no. 9 (871), pp. 28—33. [In Russ].

25. Geomekhanicheskie polya i protsessy: eksperimental'no-analiticheskie issledovaniya formi- rovaniya i razvitiya ochagovykh zon katastroficheskikh sobytiy v gornotekhnicheskikh i prirodnykh sistemakh, vol. 1. Pod red. N. N. Mel'nikova [Geomechanical fields and processes: experimental and analytical studies of the formation and development of catastrophic events in mining and natural sys- tems, vol. 1, Mel'nikov N. N. (Ed.)], Novosibirsk, 2018, 541 p.

26. Batugina I. M., Petukhov I. M. Geodinamicheskoe rayonirovanie pri stroitel'stve i ekspluatatsii rudnikov [Geodynamic zoning in the construction and exploitation of mines], Moscow, Nedra, 1988. 166 p.

27. Orlova A. V. Blokovye struktury i rel'ef [Block structures and relief], Moscow, Nedra, 1975, 232 p.

28. Sim L. A. Study of tectonic stresses by geological indicators (methods, results, recommen- dations). Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 1991, no. 10, pp. 3—22. [In Russ].

29. Sidorov D. V., Ponomarenko T. V. Methodology for assessing the geodynamics of natural and man-made systems in the implementation of deposit development projects. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020, no. 1, pp. 42—48. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2020.01.09.

30. Divakov V. I. Method of microgeodynamic studies — a new method in geology. Vestnik RUDN. Geology and prospecting. 1996, pp. 71—79. [In Russ].

31. Vernadsky V. I. About gas exchange in the earth's crust. Izvestiya Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk. 1912, vol. VI, no. 6:2, pp. 141—162. [In Russ].

32. Khilyuk L. F., Robertson J. O., Endres B., Chilingarian G. V. Gas migration: Events preceding earthquakes. Houston, Texas, Gulf Publishing Company, 2000, 390 p.

33. Korchagina T. V., Efimova N. V., Gabin A. B. Ishutina S. A. Researching methane emission into earth surface from liquidated mines. News of the Tula state university. Sciences of Earth. 2017, no. 4, pp. 48—60. [In Russ].

34. Kuzin A. M. Degasation of the Earth: from earthquakes to the formation of deposits of mineral fluid genesis. Actual Problems of Oil and Gas. 2018, no. 4(23), pp. 1—16. [In Russ].

35. Riggio A., Santulin M. Earthquake forecasting: a review of radon as seismic precursor. Bollet- tino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata. 2015, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 95—114. DOI: 10.4430/bgta0148.

36. Panina L. V., Zaitsev V. A. Neotectonics of the Northern Caspian Region. Space and Time. 2016, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 188—190. [In Russ].

37. Korchuganova N. I., Zagubny D. G., Sokolov S. A. Neotectonic zoning of the Russian Plate. Prospect and protection of mineral resources. 2012, no. 2, pp. 13—20. [In Russ].

38. Kuznetsov Yu. G., Kaftan V. I., Bebutova V. K., Serebryakova L. I., Vereshchetina A. V. Modern vertical movements of the earth's surface in the Caspian region. Geodesy and Cartography. 1997, no. 9, pp. 29—34. [In Russ].

39. Gushchenko O. I. Analysis of orientations of shear tectonic displacements and their tectono- physical interpretation in the reconstruction of paleostresses. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR. 1973, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 331—334. [In Russ].

Подписка на рассылку

Подпишитесь на рассылку, чтобы получать важную информацию для авторов и рецензентов.