Influence of morphological types of ilmenite on processability of titanomagnetite ore of Gusevogorskoe deposit

Authors: Titov R.S.

The article presents the results of mineralogical and technological studies into influence exerted by morphological types of ilmenite on magnetic separation of titanomagnetite ore of Gusevogorskoe deposit. The occurrence forms of ilmenite in titanomagnetite ore are represented by the decomposition products of solid solution of magnetite and by the products of collective recrystallization during metamorphism, in the form of lamellae of ilmenite into magnetite and compact grains of ilmenite in accretions with magnetite. The electron-probe microanalysis data on composition of morphological types of ilmenite in titanomagnetite ore samples subjected to magnetic separation are presented. To assess the influence of morphological types of ilmenite on beneficiation of titanomagnetite ore, the test ore samples were divided into magnetic fractions and into electromagnetic fractions I, II and III based on their magnetic properties. The quantitative assessment of the size of the magnetic fractions was performed, and the percentage ratio of the extracted mineral phases was determined. The X-ray phase analysis results on the magnetic fraction of the test samples are presented. Based on the experimental separation outcomes, the influence of morphological types of ilmenite on magnetite concentration in the magnetic fraction was analyzed. The results obtained will serve as an information basis for the further studies aimed at optimizing the magnetic separation modes during processing of titanomagnetite ore from Gusevogorskoe and Kachkanar deposits.

Keywords: titanomagnetite ore, mineralogical analysis, mineral composition of ore, ilmenite, magnetite, magnetic separation, lamellae, Gusevogorskoe titanomagnetite deposit.
For citation:

Titov R. S. Influence of morphological types of ilmenite on processability of titanomagnetite ore of Gusevogorskoe deposit. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2021;(5—1):192—205. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_51_0_192.

Acknowledgements:
Issue number: 5
Year: 2021
Page number: 192-205
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 622.778:549.641.23
DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_51_0_192
Article receipt date: 15.12.2020
Date of review receipt: 02.03.2021
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 10.04.2021
About authors:

Titov R. S., senior researcher, Quality management sector, Institute of Mining of Ural branch of RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia, ukr07@mail.ru.

For contacts:
Bibliography:

1. Bykhovsky L. Z., Tigunov L. P., Maslovsky P. A. The turn of complex ores has come. Metals Of Eurasia. 2005. no. 3. pp. 12—18. [In Russ]

2. Vyshegorodsky D. V. Titanomagnetite ores-a promising raw material base of metallurgy.The Ural market of metals. 2006. no. 1. p. 49. [In Russ]

3. Titanomagnetites of the Urals and their processing  technology  (2020,  January 17). Retrieved from. http:. metal-archive.ru/titanomagnetity/907-titanomagnetity-urala-itehnologiya-ih-pererabotki.html. [In Russ]

4. Pirogov B. I., Bystrov I. G. Mineralogo-tehnologicheskie osobennosti neodnorodnosti titanomagnetitov RF i metody ih ocenki [Mineralogical and  technological features of heterogeneity of titanomagnetites of the Russian Federation and methods of their estimation]. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov IX Vserossijskogo seminara po tehnologicheskoj mineralogii «Racional’noe nedropol’zovanie». Magnitogorsk: MGTU, 2014. pp. 180—187. [In Russ]

5. Bystrov I. G. Ocenka vlijanija neodnorodnosti titanomagnetita na obogatimost’ zheleznyh rud magmaticheskogo geneziza [Evaluation of the influence of heterogeneity of titanomagnetite on the enrichment of iron ores of magmatic genesis]. Dissertacija na soiskanija uch. step. kand. g-m. nauk. FGUP Vserossijskij nauchno-issledovatel’skij institut mineral’nogo syr’ja im. N. M. Fedorovskogo. Moscow, 2014. p. 117. [In Russ]

6. Bystrov I. G. Titanomagnetit kak ob’ekt tehnologicheskoj mineralogii [Titanomagnetite as an object of technological Mineralogy]. Problems of subsoil development in the XXI century through the eyes of the young: Materials of the IX international youth scientific school; ipcon RAS. Moscow, 2013. p. 251—254. [In Russ]

7. Pirogov B. I., Bronickaja E. S., Astahova Ju. M., Volkov E. S. Features of the material composition of titanomagnetite ores of igneous Genesis that determine their enrichment. Razvedka i ohrana nedr. 2013. no. 2. pp. 47—51. [In Russ]

8. Pahomov F. P., Tigunov L. P., Byhovskij L. Z. Titanomagnetitovye mestorozhdenija Rossii: mineral’no-syr’evaja baza, perspektivy osvoenija i kompleksnogo ispol’zovanija [Titanomagnetite deposits in Russia: mineral resource base, prospects for development and integrated use]. Moscow: VIMS, 2010. p. 138. [In Russ]

9. Gazaleeva G. I., Shihtov N. V., Sopina N. A., Mushketov A. A. Current trends in processing of titanium-containing ores. Chernaja metallurgija. Bjulleten’ nauchnotehnicheskoj i jekonomicheskoj informacii. 2015. no. 12. p. 30—36. [In Russ]

10. Dmitriev A. N., Vitkina G. Yu., Petukhov R. V., Kornilkov S. V., Pelevin A. E., Fishman A. Y., Sapozhnikova T. V., Shunyaev K. Y. The Characteristic of Ores and Concentrates of the Open Society «EVRAZ KGOK». Advanced Materials Research.2014. (Vol. 834 836). pp. 364—369.

11. John L. Nold, Paul Davidson, Mark A.Dudley The pilot knob magnetite deposit in the Proterozoic St. Francois Mountains Terrane, southeast Missouri, USA: A magmatic and hydrothermal replacement iron deposit. Ore Geology Reviews. 2013. Vol. 53. p 446—469. DOI:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.02.007.

12. Fominyh V. G., Kraeva Yu. P., Larina N. V. Petrologiya i rudogenezis Kachkanarskogo massiva [Petrology and ore genesis of the Kachkanar massif]. UNC AN SSSR. Sverdlovsk, 1987. 184 p. [In Russ]

13. Reznichenko V. A., Oljunina T. V., Averin V. V. Titanaty. Nauchnye osnovy, tehnologija, proizvodstvo (Titanates. Scientific basis, technology, production). Moscow: Nauka, 2013. p. 267. [In Russ]

14. Ibragimov Sh. Z. Magnetites with the structures of the disintegration of the magnetite– ulvospinel, coercive properties: modeling and experimen). Fizika Zemli. 2015. no. 6. p. 91. [In Russ]

15. Dubihski J. Sustainable development of mining mineral resources, J. Sustain. Min., 2013, Vol. 12, no. 1. pp. 1—6.

16. Wen Yu, Xiaojin Wen, Jiangan Chen, Jingzhong Kuang, Qiongyao Tang, Yuechao Tian, Jiali Fu, Weiqin Huang, Tingsheng Qiu. Preparation of Direct Reduced Iron and Titanium Nitride from Panzhihua Titanomagnetite Concentrate through Carbothermic Reduction-Magnetic Separation. Minerals. 2017. Vol. 7, issue 11. p. 1—10. DOI: 10.3390/ min7110220.

17. Hosseinzadeh M., Alizadeh M., Raouf Hosseini S. M. Mineralogical and physical beneficiation studies for iron extraction from Bardaskan titanomagnetite placer deposit. Journal of Mining & Environment. 2017. Vol. 8. no. 2. p. 191—201. DOI: 10.22044/ jme.2016.661.

18. Petrochilos L. T. The gr aduate work for the degree of master of science in geology andgeophysics. Experimental and analytical studies of titanomagnetite in synthetic and naturalsamples. UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI. 2010. p. 147.

19. Longsheng Zhao, Lina Wang, Tao Qi, Desheng Chen, Hongxin Zhao,Yahui Liu A novel method to extract iron, titanium, vanadium, and chromium from high-chromium vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrates. Hydrometallurgy. 2014. Vol. 149. pp 106— 109. DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.07.014.

20. Sisir K. Mondal, William L. Griffin Processes and Ore Deposits of Ultramafic-Mafic Magmas through Space and Time. Elsevier, 2018. p. 382. DOI: 10.1016/C2016-0-00577-6.

21. Wolfgang D. Maier, Raimo Lahtinen, Hugh O’Brien Mineral Deposits of Finland. Elsevier, 2015. p. 802. DOI: 10.1016/C2012—0-02750—0.

22. Haritonskij P. V., Sergienko E. S., Janson S. Ju., Kosterov A. A. Low temperature magnetic properties of basalts containing near ~TM30 titanomagnetite. Fizika Zemli. 2018. no. 1. pp. 140—157. [In Russ]

23. Bazuev G. V., Korolev A. V., Golovkin B. G. Dilute ferrimagnetism of ilmenites Mn3FeTiSbO9 and Mn4FeTi2SbO12). Fizika tverdogo tela. 2016. no. 7. T. 58. pp. 1289— 1295. [In Russ]

24. Kantemirov V. D., Titov R. S., Jakovlev A. M. Study of the volume weight of the titanomagnetite ore of the Gusevo-gors3ky Deposit. Surveying and subsurface use. 2017. no. 2(88). pp. 18—21. [In Russ]

25. Kantemirov V. D., Titov R. S., Jakovlev A. M. Evaluation of the influence of the mineral composition of titanomagnetite ore on the results of magnetic enrichment. Ore dressing, 2017, no. 4. pp. 36—40. [In Russ]

26. Kan V. D.-temirov, Titov R. S. Ocenka vliyaniya mineral’nogo sostava titanomagnetitovoj rudy Gusevogorskogo mestorozhdeniya na rezul’taty magnitnogo obogashcheniya. Markshejderiya i nedropol’zovanie. 2017. no. 3(89). C. 49—52. [In Russ]

27. Revnivcev V. N. Tekhnologicheskaya mineralogiya zheleznyh rud [Technological mineralogy of iron ores]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1988. 301 p. [In Russ]

Подписка на рассылку

Раз в месяц Вы будете получать информацию о новом номере журнала, новых книгах издательства, а также о конференциях, форумах и других профессиональных мероприятиях.