Heavy metal content of soils at tailings pond after reclamation at Urup Mining and Processing Plant

Mines have an adverse environmental impact, in particular, they pollute the environment with heavy metals. Urup Mining and Processing Plant (GOK) in the Caucasus produces round 46 % of copper ore reserves in the south of Russia. Local tailings feature high concentrations of copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), lead (Pb) and other heavy metals. This study focuses on the assessment of heavy metal content of soils at a tailings pond after reclamation at Urup GOK. Gross heavy metals were assessed using the X-ray fluoroscopy. Pollution was evaluated with the help of the unified contamination index, pollution load index, the Nemerow integrated pollution index, the potential ecological risk and the overall contamination index. The research findings show that gross heavy metals in soils at the test reclaimed tailings pond at Urup GOK are never higher than the background values and the reference allowable concentrations in most test samples. According to the most of calculated indexes, the soil of the reclaimed tailings pond is uncontamined (clean). The comparison of the test indexes of pollution is reflective of different degree of their environmental flexibility.

Keywords: pollution, heavy metals, reclamation, tailings pond, unified contamination index, pollution load index, the Nemerow integrated pollution index, potential ecological risk, overall contamination index.
For citation:

Khrapai E. S., KuzinaA.A., Kolesnikov S. I., Minnikova T. V., Kazeev K. Sh. Heavy metal content of soils at tailings pond after reclamation at Urup Mining and Processing Plant. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2024;(4):56-68. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2024_ 4_0_56.

Acknowledgements:

The study was carried out at the Southern Federal University and was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 23-74-01071, https://rscf.ru/project/23-74-01071/.

Issue number: 4
Year: 2024
Page number: 56-68
ISBN: 0236-1493
UDK: 57.044; 631.46
DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2024_4_0_56
Article receipt date: 13.01.2024
Date of review receipt: 19.02.2024
Date of the editorial board′s decision on the article′s publishing: 10.03.2024
About authors:

E.S. Khrapai1, Student, Laboratory Assistant, e-mail: katerinap1996@mail.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3133-7629,
A.A. Kuzina1, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Senior Researcher, e-mail: ankuzin@sfedu.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8816-5288,
S.I. Kolesnikov1, Dr. Sci. (Agr.), Professor, Head of Chair, e-mail: kolesnikov@sfedu.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5860-8420,
T.V. Minnikova1, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Leading Researcher, e-mail: loko261008@yandex.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9453-7137,
K.Sh. Kazeev1, Dr. Sci. (Geogr.), Professor, Director of D.I. Ivanovsky Academy of Biology and Biotechnology, e-mail: kazeev@sfedu.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0252-6212,
1 D.I. Ivanovsky Academy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, 344090, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.

 

For contacts:

E.S. Khrapai, e-mail: katerinap1996@mail.ru.

Bibliography:

1. Basova I. A., Ioina M. A., Glukhova E. N. Geoecological state of soil cover in mining regions. News of the Tula state university. Sciences of Earth. 2010, no. 1, pp. 16—20. [In Russ].

2. Shabanov M. V., Marichev M. S., Mangiyeva S. S., Sokolov A. A. Chemozem formation under conditions of prolong exposure to aero-industrial emissions from a mining and smelting plant. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2023, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 727—740. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2023-15-3-727-740.

3. Galhardi J. A., de Mello J. W. V., Wilkinson K. J. Environmental and health risk assessment of agricultural areas adjacent to uranium ore fields in Brazil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2020, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 3965—3981. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-020-00659-3.

4. Moshchenko D. I., Kuzina A. A., Kolesnikov S. I. Comparative assessment of the black soils sustainability in the central Caucasus and the caucasus to pollution with lead, chromium, copper, nickel and oil. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2020, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 76—87. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2020-12-1-76-87.

5. Li S. L., Jiang W., Yu H., Wang X. The recent progress China has made in green mine construction, Part I: Mining groundwater pollution and sustainable mining. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022, vol. 19, no. 9, article 5673. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095673.

6. Petrova T. A., Rudzisha E. Utilization of sewage sludge as an ameliorant for reclamation of technogenically disturbed lands. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021, vol. 251, pp. 767—776. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2021.5.16.

7. Tang L., Liu X., Wang X., Liu S., Deng H. Statistical analysis of tailings ponds in China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 2020, vol. 216, article 106579. DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2020.106579.

8. Liu B., Wang S., Wang J., Zhang X., Shen Z., Shi L., Chen Y. The great potential for phytoremediation of abandoned tailings pond using ectomycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris. Science of the Total Environment. 2020, vol. 719, article 137475. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137475.

9. Mitrakova N. V., Khayrulina E. A., Blinov S. M., Perevoshchikova A. A. Efficiency of acid sulphate soils reclamation in coal mining areas. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023, vol. 260, pp. 266—278. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2023.31.

10. Pencea I., Turcu R. N., Popescu-Argeș A. C., Timiș A. L., Priceputu A., Ungureanu C., Niculescu F. L. An improved balanced replicated sampling design for preliminary screening of the tailings ponds aiming at zero-waste valorization. A Romanian case study. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023, vol. 331, article 117260. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jenvman.2023.117260.

11. Yu H., Zahidi I., Fai C. M. Reclaiming abandoned mine tailings ponds for agricultural use: Opportunities and challenges. Environmental Research. 2023, vol. 232, article 116336. DOI: 10.1016/j. envres.2023.116336.

12. Yurak V. V. Apakashev R. A., Valiev N. G., Lebzin M. S. Sorbent-based method of soils detoxification from heavy metals. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2021, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 135—150. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2021-13-1-135-150.

13. Moshchenko D. I., Kolesnikov S. I., Kuzina A. A., Mezhenkov A. A., Litvinov Yu. A. Prognostic map charts of ecosystem functioning violation in soil in the Central Ciscaucasia and the Caucasus in contamination with different copper concentrations. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2023, no. 5-1, pp. 104—116. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2023_51_0_104.

14. Kazeev K. Sh., Kolesnikov S. I., Akimenko Yu. V., Dadenko E. V. Metody biodiagnostiki nazemnykh ekosistem [Methods of biodiagnostics of terrestrial ecosystems], Rostov-on-Don, Izd-vo YuFU, 2016, 356 p.

15. Kowalska J. B., Mazurek R., Gąsiorek M., Zaleski T. Pollution indices as useful tools for the comprehensive evaluation of the degree of soil contamination. A review. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2018, vol. 40, pp. 2395—2420. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-018-0106z.

16. Varol M. Assessment of heavy metal contamination in sediments of the Tigris River (Turkey) using pollution indices and multivariate statistical techniques. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2011, vol. 195, pp. 355—364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.051.

17. Qingjie Gong, Jun Deng, Xiang Yunchuan, Wang Qingfei, Liqiang Ya Calculating pollution indices by heavy metals in ecological geochemistry assessment and a case study in parks of Beijing. Journal of China University of Geosciences. 2008, vol. 19, pp. 230—241. DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0705(08) 60042-4.

18. Håkanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic. Pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Research. 1980, vol. 14, pp. 975—1001. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8.

19. Avdoshchenko V. G., Klimova A. V. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in the soils of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Kamchatka territory. Bulletin of Kamchatka state technical university. 2022, no. 61, pp. 65—81. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.17217/2079-0333-2022-61-65-81.

20. Saet Yu. E., Revich B. A., Yanin E. P., etc. Geokhimiya okruzhayushchey sredy [Geochemistry of the environment], Moscow, Nedra, 1990, 335 p.

21. Kuznetsov A. M. Fesyun A. P., Samokhvalov S. G., Makhon'ka E. P. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po opredeleniyu tyazhelykh metallov v pochvakh sel'khozugodiy i produktsii rastenievodstva [Methodological guidelines for the determination of heavy metals in soils of farmland and crop production], Moscow, 1992, 57 p.

22. Frequent inaccuracies and errors in the application of statistical methods in soil science. Bulletin V.V. Dokuchaev soil science institute. 2020, no. 102, pp. 164—182. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.19047/01361694-2020-102-164-182.

23. Moshchenko D. I., Kuzina A. A., Kolesnikov S. I. Ecologically safe nickel concentrations in soils of the Central Ciscaucasia and the Caucasus. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2022, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 401—409. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2022-14-3-401-409.

24. Natsional'nyy proekt «Ekologiya» [National project «Ecology»], https://www.mnr.gov.ru/activity/np_ecology/fp-chistaya-strana/. [In Russ].

Подписка на рассылку

Подпишитесь на рассылку, чтобы получать важную информацию для авторов и рецензентов.