Organizational and economic mechanism of risk management in urban underground construction

The quantitative measure of danger during any activity is risk. It is a component of technological and environmental safety, a vector value that includes: the amount of damage from the impact of a dangerous factor, the probability of occurrence of this factor and the uncertainty of these values. Analysis of world experience has shown that a large number of economic mechanisms can be used to solve the problem of risk reduction in urban underground construction, which differ from each other only in some modifications. To increase the technogenic and environmental safety, first of all, a general goal should be highlighted, such as optimizing the technology for ensure it compatibility with the environment, safety of personnel of underground facilities, maintaining the balance of the natural and technical geosystem «rock mass — technology — underground construction — environment», reducing the mathematical expectation of damage, etc . In addition to the general or main goal safety control, there are special goals of a directing and point (focused on achieving a specific result) nature. Together with the main goal, they are combined into a goal tree that has hierarchical levels. An important stage in risk control in urban underground construction is the development of alternative options for environmental and technological solutions. The task is to select the most appropriate option under the given conditions with regard of the dynamics of the environmental imbalance and potential limitations. While considering various scenarios of construction of the underground facility, each of which investigates the efficiency of organizational-economic mechanism of its implementation.

Kulikova E.Yu. Organizational and economic mechanism of risk management in urban underground construction. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020;(6-1):128-136. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-61-0-128-136.

Kulikova E.Yu., Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Prof., Department «Construction of Underground Structures and Mining Enterprises», National university of science and technology «MISIS», Russia.

1. Akimov V.A., Vladimirov V.A., Izmalkov V.I. Katastrofy I bezopastnost: MTCS Rossii [Catastrophes and safety; EMERCOM of Russia]. Moscow: Delovoy Express, 2006. 392 p. [In Russ]

2. Klebanov F.S. Obschaya teoria bezopasnosti [General theory of safety]. «15 years of RAEN. Mining and metallurgical section (exploration, mining, metallurgy)». Moscow: Intermet Engineering, 2005. pp. 175—186 [In Russ]

3. Pelipenko M.V., Balovtsev S.V., Aynbinder I.I. Integrated accident risk assessment in mines. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2019, no. 11, pp. 180—192. DOI: 10.25018/0236— 1493—2019—11—0-180—192. [In Russ]. [In Russ]

4. Balovtsev S.V., Skopintseva O.V., Kolikov K.S. Aerological risk management in designing, operation, closure and temporary shutdown of coal mines. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020;(6):85-94. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-6-0-85-94.

5. Batugin, A., Odintsev, V., Kolikov, K., Lijiang, Y., & Khotchenkov, E. (2018). Displacement and mine seismicity processes during undermining of a tectonically active fault area at the sinvay deposit. Paper presented at the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 18(1.3) 319—326.

6. Balovtsev S.V., Shevchuk R.V. Geomechanical monitoring of mine shafts in difficult ground conditions. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2018, no. 8, pp. 77—83. DOI: 10.25018/0236—1493—2018—8-0—77—83. [In Russ]

7. Krasniansky G.L. Investitsionnaya politika ugolno y otrasli [Investment policy of the coal industry]. Moscow: AGN, 1999. 327 p. [In Russ] [In Russ]

8. Etalony TEO stroitelsyva predptiyatiy po dobyche I obogashcheniyu ugla [The standards of feasibility study, construction of enterprises for extraction and enrichment of coal]. edited by G.L. Krasnyansky, V.M. Eremeev. Moscow: AGN Publishing House, 1988. Vol. I, II. 438, 271p. [In Russ]

9. Burkov V.N., Shchepkin A.V. Ekologiycheskaya bezopasnost’ [Environmental safety]. Moscow: IPU RAS, 2003. 92 p. [In Russ]

10. Buyanov V.P., Kirsanov K.A., Mikhailova L.M. Riscologia (upravleniye riskami) [Riskology (risk management)]. Manual. for universities. 2nd ed. ISPR. add. Moscow: publishing house «Exam», 2003. 384 p. [In Russ] [In Russ]

11. Ilyichev V.A., Petrukhin V.P., Kolybin I.V., Meshchansky A.B., Bakholdin B.V. Geotekhnicheskiye problem stroitelstva TRK «Manezhnaya plosgchad» [Geo-technical problems of construction of the Manezhnaya square shopping Mall]. Moscow: NIIOSP named after.N.M. Gersevanov. Proceedings of the Institute, Ed. «Econo mics and Transport», 2001, pp. 31—38. [In Russ]

12. GOST R 51897—2002. Menedgment riska. Terminy i opredelenia [State standard R 51897—2002. Risk management. Terms and definitions]. Moscow: publishing house of standards, 2002. 7 p. [In Russ]

13. Kulikova E.Yu. Operational Safety and Environmental Sustainability in the Development of Urban Underground Space, Proceedings WTC 2018, ITA AITES WORLD TUNNEL CONGRESS Dubai 21—26 April, 2018, pp. 992—106.

14. Zhukovsky Yu. B. Vysokaya tsena oshibol (otzenka ustoitchivosty I expluatacionno y bezopasnosti ob’ektov pri expertize proektov [High price of errors (assessment of stability and operational safety of objects during project expertise]. In the newspaper «Construction expert» no. 12, January 2000. [In Russ]

15. Brillinger D R, 2003, Risk Analysis: Examples and Discussion, Applications of Statistics and Probabilities in Civil Engineering, Millpress, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

16. Hebblewhite, BK 2019. Geotechnical risk in mining methods and practice: critical issues and pitfalls of risk management, in J Wesseloo (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 2019 pp. 299—308.

17. Burkov V.N., Graciansky E.V., Zubko S.I., Schepkin A.V. Modelb I mrkhanizmy ypravlenia bezopasnostiy (Model and mechanisms for safety management). A Series Of «Security». Moscow: SINTEG, 2001, 160 p. [In Russ]

18. R.K. Mishra, M. Janiszewski, L.K.T. Uotinen, M. Szydlowska, T. Siren, M. Rinne Geotechnical Risk Management Concept for Intelligent Deep Mines. Procedia Engineering 191.2017. pp. 361—368.

19. Debelov N.N., Zavyalova E.N., Krivozubov A.E. Assessment of investment project risks. Bulletin of the Tomsk state University of architecture and construction. Publishing house: Tomsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. no. 1(9) 2004. pp. 234— 237 [In Russ]

20. Natocheeva N.N. Factors’ impact on the equity cost of capital in mergers and acquisitions/ E-SdPTCONICIT Espacios (ISSN07981015-Venezuela-Scopus), June, 2018, 712966 http://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n27/18392729.html.

21. Natocheeva N.N. Risk management and optimization of bank loans allocation in the project financing program. AES-SHU (ASERS). Journal of Applied Econo mic Sciences (ISSN18436110-Romania-Scopus), 00, 990166 Volume Issue 1 (55) Spring 2018. PP 65—73 http://cesmaa.org /Docs/JAES%20SpringVolumeXIII_1 (55)2018_online.pdf.

22. Kuznetsova M.O. Risk management implementation practices in Russian industrial companies: results of an empirical study. Strategic research and risk management. Volume 9, no 4, 2019. pp. 410—423 [In Russ]

23. Kulikova, E.Yu. Assessment of polymer materials environmental compatibility in underground development. Ecology and Industry of Russia. Vol. 20. No3. 2016, pp. 28—31. [In Russ]

24. Mazzoccoli Alessandro, Naldi Maurizio. Robustness of Optimal Investment Decisions in Mixed Insurance/Investment Cyber Risk Management. An International Journal «Risk Analysis». vol. 40, Issue 3. 2019. pp. 550—564.