Bibliography: 1. Sokolov S.Ya., Ryazantsev P. А., Klimovsky А. V., Nilov М.Yu. Geophysical method for the study of a natural rock sequence at dimension stone deposits. Gorny zhurnal. no. 5. 2011. pp. 15—19 [In Russ]
2. Sokolov S.Ya. Klimovsky А. V. Kuzminykh Е. N. Sostoyanie voprosa o geologogeofizicheskih metodah pri poiskah, ocenke i razvedke blochnogo kamnya [On the use of geologogeophysical methods for prospecting, appraisal and exploration of dimension stone deposit]. Quarrying, processing and application of dimension stone. Proceedings of an international technological conference. Magnitogorsk, MGTU. Vol. 16 . 2016. pp. 35—58. [In Russ]
3. Sokolov S.Ya. Кlimovsky А. V. Kuzminykh Е. N. Vozmozhnosti geofizicheskih metodov pri ekspluatacionnoj razvedke mestorozhdenij blochnogo kamnya na primere mestorozhdeniya granosienitov Baltijskoe [Potential of geophysical methods for the quarrying survey of dimension stone deposits (case study of Baltiyskoye granosyenite deposit. Building stone: from geology to architecture]. Petrozavodsk. KarRC, RAS. 2015, pp. 70—77. [In Russ]
4. Shekov V. А., Ivanov А. А. Teoriya «razgruzhennogo massiva» [“Unloaded massif” theory]. Building stone: from geology to architecture. Petrozavodsk. KarRC, RAS. 2015. pp. 48—58 [In Russ]
5. Ivanov A., Shekov V., Myasnikova O. Method for assessment of the monolithic pattern of a massif by analysis of macroand microfracturing of igneous rocks. 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM 2018: Conference proceedings, Albena, Bulgaria, 02—08 July 2018. p. 229—236.
6. Harma, P. 2020. Natural stone exploration in the classic Wiborg rapakivi granite batholith of southeastern Finland new insights from integration of lithological, geophysical and structural data. Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin 411. http:. tupa.gtk.fi/julkaisu/ bulletin/bt_411.pdf (03.03.2021).
7. Luodes, H. 2015. Ground penetrating radar and assessment of natural stone. Geological Survey of Finland, Report of Investigation 223. 46 p. http:. tupa.gtk.fi/julkaisu/ tutkimusraportti/tr_223.pdf (03.03.2021).
8. Huotari, T. et al., Geophysical measurements in a natural stone prospect in the Wiborg rapakivi granite batholiths. GTK Open File Work Report 84/2018. 44 p. (http:. tupa. gtk.fi/raportti/arkisto/84_2018.pdf) (03.03.2021).
9. Danilyev S. М. et al. Study of fracturing at a facing stone deposit using the georadiolocation method. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Inzhiniring georesursov. 2020. V. 331. no. 9. pp. 140—145. [In Russ]
10. Harma, P., Luodes, N., Pirinen, H. & Selonen, O. Celi i rezul’taty proekta «Effektivnoe ispol’zovanie prirodnogo kamnya v Leningradskoj oblasti i Yugo-Vostochnoj Finlyandii» v programme Evropejskogo Soyuza «Prigranichnoe sotrudnichestvo i partnerstvo» [Goals and results of the Project «Efficient use of dimension stone in the Leningrad Region and Southeastern Finland” in the EU Programme «Trans-border cooperation and partnership»]. Building stone: from geology to architecture. Petrozavodsk, 2015, pp. 35—41 [In Russ]
11. Pershin G. D., Ulyakov М. S. A method for calculating the rational parameters of cutoff stone monoliths upon quarrying deposits with the complex mode of occurrence of natural fractures in a massif. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federalnogo universiteta. Tekhnika i tekhnologii. 2015. no.8. P. 1032—1039 [In Russ]
12. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po primeneniyu Klassifikacii zapasov mestorozhdenij i prognoznyh resursov tverdyh poleznyh iskopaemyh. Stroitel’nyj i oblicovochnyj kamen’ [Recommended methods for the use of the Classification of the solid mineral reserves and predicted resources of deposits. Building and facig stones]. Moscow, 2007 (http:. gkz-rf.ru/ tverdye-poleznye-iskopaemye). [In Russ]