Bibliography: 1. Trubetskoy K. N., Galchenko Yu. P. Prirodopodobnaya geotekhnologiya kompleksnogo osvoeniya nedr: problemy i perspektivy [Nature-like geotechnology for integrated subsoil management: problems and prospects], Moscow, OOO «Nauchtekhlitizdat», 2020, 368 p.
2. Trubetskoy K. N., Myaskov A. V., Galchenko Yu.P., Eremenko V. A. Creation and justification of convergent technologies for underground mining of thick solid mineral deposits. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2019, no. 5, pp. 6—13. [In Russ].
3. Galchenko Yu. P., Eremenko V. A., Kosyreva M. A., Vysotin N. G. Features of secondary stress field formation under anthropogenic change in subsoil during underground mineral mining. Eurasian Mining. 2020, no. 1, pp. 9—13.
4. Eremenko V. A., Aksenov Z. V., Pul E. K., Zakharov N. E. MAP 3D analysis of secondary stress field structure in face area of development headings in rockburst-hazardous seams. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020, no. 5, pp. 91—104. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-50-91-104.
5. Eremenko V. A., Galchenko Yu. P., Kosyreva M. A. Effect of mining geometry on natural stress field in underground ore mining with conventional and nature-like technologies. Fizikotekhnicheskiye problemy razrabotki poleznykh iskopayemykh. 2020, no. 3, pp. 98—109. [In Russ].
6. Galchenko Yu. P., Eremenko V. A. Evolution of secondary stress field during underground mining of thick ore bodies. Eurasian Mining. 2021, no. 1, pp. 21—24.
7. Kirpichev M. V. Teoriya podobiya [Similarity theory], Moscow, AN SSSR, 1953, 96 p.
8. Arora K., Gutierrez M., Hedayat A. New physical model to study tunnels in squeezing clayrich rock. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 2021, vol. 44, no. 6, article 20200081.
9. Arora K., Gutierrez M., Hedayat A. Physical modeling of lined tunnel in squeezing ground conditions. Geo-Congress 2020: Engineering, Monitoring and Management of Geotechnical Infrastructure. Minneapolis, 2020, pp. 335—344.
10. Jiang Q., Feng X., Song L., Gong Y., Zheg H., Cui J. Modeling rockspecimens through 3D printing: Tentative experiments and prospects. Acta Mechanica Sinica. 2015, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 524—535.
11. Kong L., Ostadhassan M., Li C., Tamimi N. Rock physics and geomechanics of 3D printed rocks. ARMA 51st U.S. Rock Mechanics, Geomechanics Symposium. San Francisco, California, USA, 2017.
12. Gell E. M., Walley S. M., Braithwaite C. H. Review of the validity of the use of artificial specimens for characterizing the mechanical properties of rocks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2019, vol. 52, no. 9.
13. Eremenko V. A., Galchenko Yu.P., Vysotin N. G., Leyzer V. I. Kosyreva M. A. Strength, deformation and acoustic characteristics of physical models of frame and honeycomb underground structures. Fiziko-tekhnicheskiye problemy razrabotki poleznykh iskopayemykh. 2020, no. 6, pp. 93—104. [In Russ].
14. Galchenko Yu. P., Leizer V. I., Vysotin N. G., Yakusheva E. D. Procedure justification for laboratory research of secondary stress field in creation and application of convergent technology for underground mining of rock salt. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2019, no. 11, pp. 35—47. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2019-11-0-35-47.
15. Vysotin N. G., Kosyreva M. A., Leyzer V. I., Aksenov Z. V. Design rationale for engineering multipurpose bench for physical simulation of geomechanical processes in secondary stress fields under conditions of mining with convergent geotechnologies. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2019, no. 10, pp. 131—145. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2019-10-0-131-145.
16. User manual CreatBot 3D Printer. Henan Suwei Electronics Technology Company, Limited, 2018. 41 p.