Requirements for the location of the observing station for monitoring the deformation processes under the influence of modern geodynamic movements

The article spots the problems of choosing the location of the observation station for monitoring deformation processes under the influence of modern geodynamic movements. The object of research is the modern geodynamic movements observed in the rock mass. The purpose of the work is to determine the parameters of the observational station location relative to tectonic faults, which are a zone of concentration of geodynamic movements. The work spots the requirements for the observation station, necessary for the effective monitoring of deformation processes occurring under the influence of modern geodynamic movements. Based on the knowledge of the parameters of modern geodynamic movements, as well as their localization at the boundaries of secondary structural blocks, recommendations are given and substantiated for organization an observation station, the purpose of which is to timely record the action of geodynamic movements in a rock mass. The characteristic of the observation station and its constituent elements is given. Research methods: analysis of Russian’s and international researches of the parameters of geodynamic events proceeded in the rock. As a result, recommendations were made on the location of an observational station used in monitoring deformation processes under the influence of modern geodynamic movements.

Shemetov R.S. Requirements for the location of the observing station for monitoring the deformation processes under the influence of modern geodynamic movements. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020;(3-1):275-284. [In Russ]. DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-31-0-275-284.

Shemetov R.S., mining engineer, leading engineer of the laboratory of geomechanics and engineering research, Polyus Project LLC, 660041, Krasnoyarsk, ul. TV, 1, building 9, shemetovrs@yandex.ru.

1. Sadovskij M.A., Bolhovitinov L.G., Pisarenko V.F. About the properties of rock discreteness. Izv. AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli. 1982. no 12. pp. 3—18. [In Russ]

2. Sadovskij M.A., Bolhovitinov L.G., Pisarenko V.F. Deformirovanie geofizicheskoj sredy i sejsmicheskij process [Geophysical environment deformation and seismic process]. Moscow: Nauka 1987 101 p. [In Russ]

3. Hakan Elci. Rock mass block quality designation for marble production / International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences (vol. 69) Oxford, England 2014 26—30 P.

4. Sashurin A.D. Sovremennye geodinamicheskie dvizheniya i ih rol’ v formirovanii napryazhenno-deformirovannogo sostoyaniya massiva gornyh porod [Modern geodynamic movements and their role in the formation of the stress-strain state of a rock mass]. Geomekhanika v gornom dele: doklady Vserossijskoj nauchno-tekhnicheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem 4—5 iyunya 2014g. Ekaterinburg: IGD UrO RAN 2014 296 p. [In Russ]

5. Kornilkov S.V., Panzhin A.A. Ural’skaja nauchnaja shkola geomehanikov: fundamental’nye i prikladnye issledovanija. Problemy nedropol’zovaniya (setevoe periodicheskoe nauchnoe izdanie). Ekaterinburg 2018 no 3. pp. 10—20. [In Russ]

6. Vazouras P., Dakoulas P., Karamanos S.A. Pipe-soil interaction and pipeline performance under strike-slip fault movements / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (vol. 72) Elsevier Science Publishing Company Netherlands 2015 pp. 48—65.

7. Kusumoto S., Hamamoto T., Fukuda Y, Takahashi A. Vertical movements of the Murono Mud volcano in Japan caused by the Naganoken Kamishiro Fault earthquake in 2014 / Earth, Planet and Space (vol. 67) Terra Scientific Publishing Company Japan, 2015 53 p.

8. Sainoki A., Mitri H.S., Chinnasane D. Characterization of aseismic fault-slip in a deep hard rock mine through numerical modelling: case study / Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (vol. 50) Austria, 2017 pp. 2709—2729.

9. SHemetov R.S., Filippov Yu.A. Justification of the choice of the location of the observation station for geomonitoring deformations of structures. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2017. no 10 pp. 205—211. [In Russ]

10. Sashurin A.D. Stanovlenie i razvitie Ural’skoj shkoly geomekhanikov. Geotekhnologicheskie problemy kompleksnogo osvoeniya nedr [Formation and development of the Ural school of geomechanics]: sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Vyp. 3 (93). Geomekhanika v gornom dele IGD UrO RAN. Ekaterinburg 2005. pp. 3—12. [In Russ]

11. Ponomarenko M.R. Razrabotka metoda deformacionnogo monitoringa otkrytyh rabot v usloviyah krajnego severa s ispol’zovaniem kosmicheskogo radiolokacionnogo zondirovaniya [Razrabotka metoda deformacionnogo monitoringa otkrytyh rabot v uslovijah krajnego severa s ispol’zovaniem kosmicheskogo radiolokacionnogo zondirovanija]. avtoreferat na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata tekhnicheskih nauk Sankt-Peterburg 2018 23 p. [In Russ]

12. Raghuvanshi T.K. Plane failure in rock slopes A review on stability analysis techniques. Journal of King Saud University Science, vol. 31, Issue 1 2019 pp. 101—109.

13. Panzhin A.A. The role of tectonic disturbances in the process of displacement in the mines of the Vysokogorsky GOK. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 2005. no 4. pp. 131—136. [In Russ]

14. Sashurin A.D., Mel’nik V.V., Panzhin A.A., Vedernikov A.S., Panzhina N.A., Pustuev A.L., Rybak S.A. Baza eksperimental’nyh dannyh o parametrah sovremennyh geodinamicheskih dvizhenij [Database of experimental data on the parameters of modern geodynamic movements, Russian Federation]. IGD UrO RAN. Ekaterinburg 2013. [In Russ]

15. Zembaty Z. How to model rockburst seismic loads for civil engineering purposes?. Bull Earthquake Eng 2011. DOI 10.1007/s10518—011—9269-z.

16. Loushnikov V.N. Practical aspects of geotechnical engineering in underground mining. KarGTU MEngSc 2012.